100 years ago

We are approaching the centenary of World War I (as we now call it). This was a war of firsts,
the first global war, the first time civilians at home were targeted by bombing from the air, or dying in merchant ships from neutral countries, the first industrial war that used weapons of terror like chlorine and mustard gas, tanks, flame throwers and the first extensive use of submarines and machine guns. It was the first time the United States of America became involved in a war in Europe.
The war was of course a horror, but we should learn by trying to understand what caused it and kept it going. I have been reading some books about it,
"The Proud Tower" and "The Guns of August", both by Barbara W. Tuchman, well written, taking viewpoints from all sides yet still focused,
and
"To End All Wars" by Adam Hochschild, mainly from the English point of view and many details from the home front.

Perhaps another approach would be to read the authors of the time, like
John Buchan
Rudyard Kipling
John Galsworthy
Charlotte Despard, the eldest sister of Sir John French
Emmeline Pankhurst and her daughter Sylvia
Virginia and Leonard Woolf
Vera Brittain
Beatrice Webb
Thomas Hardy
Arthur Conan Doyle
Siegfried Sassoon

Wilfred Owen
H.G. Wells
Winston Churchill

Swimmers

Annette Funicello

One of my earliest memories: Annette Funicello of the Mouseketeers.
I heard today that she has just passed away.

Margaret Thatcher

Margaret Thatcher died last night. Once upon a time the practice was to respect the recently deceased even if we didn't like them, reflecting the idea the God, not ourselves is the judge.

However, in these barbarous days, everyone is giving free character assessments and venting their obsessions, completely disregarding the feelings of her family. We live in ugly times.

Obituaries will come, but I just read a piece by Peter Hitchens, using his style of making a point by painting a picture. He regards Mrs Thatcher as neither a saint nor a devil and manages to occupy the middle ground that the breathless news reporters tell us is empty. He does seem to have a high regard for her, as did his brother Christopher. It must be one of the few things they agreed about.

Anyway, I think the article by Peter Hitchens which is linked above is worth reading.

Tranen over Mortsel

Tears over Mortsel.
I used to live in Mortsel, a suburb of Antwerp in Belgium. On 5th April 1943, 70 years ago, American bombers attacked a plane factory nearby and killed 1000 Belgian civilians, including 200 children. Such is "total war".

Steps and Stairs

- Posted using BlogPress

Location:Cobbittee Street,Hmas Penguin,Australia

Tell and Show

I just read an interesting article about education by Frank Furedi. I think it is well worth going to this link and reading the article.

My personal experience about such matters comes from an uncompleted Graduate Diploma of Education degree and forays into schools to do Scripture classes.

During the Grad Dip Ed, I was shocked by repeated examples of university students saying they don't believe what they were being taught, but they were prepared to jump the hurdles and do the essays in order to finish their degree. Some examples are:

• there is no such thing as absolute truth, therefore it is impossible for the teacher to transfer their ideas and experiences to the students by explaining them. All that can be done is to facilitate learning experiences that allow the students to each create their own view of reality.
• any student is capable of achieving the outcomes of any subject. If a student fails to do this, it is because they lack material support because of their low socioeconomic background, and/or they lack "social capital", in other words, the experiences and support given by their upbringing and guardians. There is no such thing as innate ability that limits performance.
• any gender linked behaviour or characteristics is a result of upbringing and environment, it is not an inevitable consequence of gender.
• Marxism is one of the most reliable way of explaining why societies are organised the way they are.
• the children must be "engaged" in whatever way possible, using interesting sounds and images. They should not be led to believe that engagement and concentration can be hard work and can occasionally be boring.

From my observation of classes, some practices and assumptions have crept in that defy reality. Despite the great efforts of dedicated teachers, it is very hard for them to resist the dogma forced on them by the education industry. For example:

• rote learning is bad. While walking around schools, I never hear classes reciting the multiplication tables, as they would have "in my day".  I have, however, seen children who can pretend they know the times tables by becoming very fast at repeated addition. This pretence falls apart when they have to do division. I suppose the successful students have to rely on the "social capital" of their parents.
• the typical primary classroom is covered in artworks, all of them identical except for minor modifications of colour and size. Obviously they have been given a model and the aim is to make a successful copy. Is the intention to encourage imagination, or neat draftsmanship?
• the primary syllabus is full to overflowing with commemoration of events such as Anzac Day, time consuming trips to museums, attempts at enforced creativity (see above), exhortations to live a healthy lifestyle (no smoking, no bullying, eat well, and in the near future, financial management for year 6...), simultaneous Mandarin and French lessons, etc etc. After spending hours and hours of each week on these tasks and on the elaborate projects and deliverables that wallpaper the classroom and impress the Principal and visiting parents and senior friends, along come the NAPLAN tests that assess the 3 "R"s and nothing else. Pity the poor teachers who have to manage all this.

It may be self-serving of me to say this, but it appears to me that the humble Scripture lesson is one of the few times in the working day of a primary school student when abstract thought is asked of them. After a day of splashing paint around the class wet room, collecting recipes from the local Chinese restaurant, growing plants in a pot in the classroom and measuring the school playground again, they walk unprepared into the Scripture class. 

There they are asked:

• the difference between a virtue and good works
• did Martha or Mary follow the better path?
• what does "trespass" mean?
• are people who do bad things bad people?
• should I hate anyone?
• if God didn't make God, who did?
• what is the difference between Anglicans and Catholics?
• did King David live before or after Saint Francis?
• did either of them live before or after Captain Philip?

It would be much easier to be splashing paint.